Humanoid Silicon Robot taking over jobs

Tough Love: AI is here. It's ROUGH

October 30, 202512 min read

While this was happening quietly in the background since 2024. The culmination of world, economic, and political events around the world seemed to have struck a chord during Q4 of 2025', especially heading into the holidays. What am I on about?

Kobessi Letter Global Industry commentator lists job cuts from UPS Amazon for 2025

The original Post on X

To summarize:

Kobeissi post hits like a bad hangover reminder of that original list—UPS downsizing 48,000, Amazon eyeing 30,000 more, Intel's 24,000, Nestlé's 16,000, and the rest waiting in the wings for this quarters' "CUT OR NO CUT", except these are not just numbers. And, this is not a TV SHOW.

Current toals?: Over 170,000 and climbing, with tech alone shedding 108,000 this year. The market's schizophrenic: TECH/AI soaring to new heights. Micro, small, and medium caps tucking in for a long red nap—S&P 500 dipping 2% last week on layoff jitters and Fed whispers of another rate trim, Nasdaq wobbling; cold feet on a wet stormy night.

But why now? Why these behemoths? Buckle up; it's a cocktail of post-pandemic bloat, AI's sneaky knife in the back of the middle class, and capital sloshing into silicon dreams while the cubicle crowd gets the boot. I'll unpack it raw, with the receipts—no econobabble, just the salty truth from someone who's seen tech eat its young before. *big inhale

First off, the big picture: We're in what the suits call a "no hire, no fire" hangover from the ZIRP circus, circa. 2020-2022, when cheap money had everyone staffing up like it was the last lifeboat off the Titanic. Now, with rates at 4.75% and tariffs biting (thanks, trade wars 2.0), companies are pruning like it's bonsai season.

Consumer spending's flatlining—holiday retail forecasts down 3% YoY—and that government shutdown fog's got economists squinting at job reports like they're hieroglyphs. Unemployment's ticking to 4.3%, but white-collar hits are the real gut punch: Up 203% in retail alone, per Challenger Gray Christmas data.

It's not recession screams yet, but the VIX is spiking like a caffeine addict at 3 a.m., and investor cash is fleeing to bonds yielding 4.2%. Irony? Stocks for these cutters are up—Amazon's popped 5% post-announcement, because Wall Street loves a lean mean profit machine.

Additional drill down: What's cooking on the inside? It's a three-headed hydra—capital bets on AI infra gobbling payroll, bots quietly union-busting white-collar drudgery, and a "efficiency or bust" vibe that's got CEOs channeling their inner Marie Kondo.

Capital Investment: The Trillion-Dollar AI Casino Bet Big cap is not hurting; they're reallocating like poker pros going all-in on black. Tech's CAPex explosion is biblical—Alphabet's dropping $91-93 billion in 2025 on data centers and GPUs, Meta's at $70-72 billion (up from $66 billion estimates), Microsoft and pals combined torched $78 billion last quarter alone, an 89% YoY surge.

Private AI funding? $33.9 billion in 2024, 8.5x from 2022, per Stanford's AI Index. Amazon's leading the charge with $100 billion this year, funneled straight into AWS Bedrock and Rufus chatbots—tools that now handle 40% of routine tasks. UPS? They're not just cutting 48,000; they're plowing savings into ML for route optimization, expecting $2 billion annual cuts to fund it. Intel's irony is chef's kiss: Slashing 24,000 to "turn around" while betting big on AI chips (their own H100 rivals), but demand's so hot they're backordered to 2026. Nestlé and Ford? Commodity squeezes and EV pivots, but both nodding to AI for supply chain tweaks—Nestlé's automating 20% of admin, Ford's eyeing robot assembly lines. The punchline? These "savings" aren't for rainy days; they're rocket fuel for the AI arms race. Palantir's Joe Lonsdale calls it out: Tech's downplaying the energy suck, but it's a $1 trillion+ infrastructure binge by 2027. Stocks love it—NVIDIA's up 150% YTD—but the humans? Collateral damage.

AI Takeover: Bots Don't Need Benefits (Or Therapy) Here's the raw gut-twist: AI's not "coming"—it's here, nibbling at the edges since ChatGPT dropped, but 2025's the year it bites chunks. Goldman Sachs pegs 6-7% of U.S. workers (18 million jobs) at direct risk, mostly white-collar code monkeys, analysts, and paper-pushers. Amazon's the poster child: 30,000 office jobs (10% of corporate staff) axed starting Oct 29, targeting HR, AWS ops, and strategy—precisely where Bedrock AI's drafting docs and Rufus is fielding queries.

McKinsey's got pilots showing 20% productivity pops, but error rates up 15% in AI workflows—yet CEOs like Jassy don't care; margins could jump to 8% by '26. Accenture? 11,000 cuts in consulting, where AI's auditing data faster than any junior ever could.

PwC and Salesforce? Same script—5,600 and 4,000 gone, reallocating to "AI augmentation" that's code for "fewer humans, please." Even non-tech like Target (1,800) and Kroger (1,000) are dipping toes, using AI for inventory that used to need armies of planners.

X chatter's apocalyptic: One thread calls it the "AI Job-pocalypse," with Amazon white-collars "toast" and nations like the U.S. staring down poverty if we don't pivot. Anthropic's Dario Amodei warns: Half of entry-level white-collar gigs could vanish in 1-5 years, spiking unemployment to 10-20%. Straight talk? We've romanticized the office drone since Mad Men; now bots are the new Don Draper, minus the scotch habit. OK not harsh; maybe a bit, but I'm winding to a point. THIS IS TOUGH LOVE.

White-Collar Washout: The Cubicle Carnage This is where it gets personal—like watching your rotary phone get yeeted for an iPhone that knows your kinks better than you do. White-collar's the bullseye: WSJ reports a surge in office layoffs as AI chews through tasks once sacred to MBAs—analytics, moderation, forecasting. 1.6 million U.S. layoffs monthly in 2025, with tech/retail white-collar up 200% YoY; blue-collar's safer (for now), but robotics are warming up. Amazon's not touching warehouses yet—ironic, since that's where the real grind is—but middle managers? Toast, with AI handling 50% of Salesforce tasks alone.

Oracle, Dropbox, Block: All citing AI for cuts, per Yahoo Finance. Broader? EEOC data shows urban diverse centers hit hardest, with tech grads underemployed at 20%. X voices are raw: "White-collar disruption's full throttle—40-80% tasks automated in software/HR/legal," with entry-level drying up like a martini at happy hour. Reuters warns of "accelerated layoffs" as sentiment sours and AI targets suits. The wit? We spent decades climbing ladders to nowhere; now the rungs are dissolving into code.

Bottom line? This really isn't the 1990s dot-com bust—it's surgical, AI-fueled Darwinism where capital chases chips over cheeks in seats. Companies aren't dying; they're molting, shedding human fat for silicon muscle. Amazon's AWS grows 19%, UPS packages hit records despite cuts—profits hum while people hum job boards. The irony's thicker than toner dust: We built these machines to serve us, and now they're serving notices. Grab a skill that bots can't fake yet—empathy, chaos-wrangling—or join the fax fossils in nostalgia. What's your play in this circus? Spill; I've got stories from the dial-up trenches and sweaty bullpens. They are not pretty, but they were real people like myself "smiling & dialin."

Now What? Where's the "TOUGH LOVE PART"

I hear you loud and clear—this author is NOT beating up on her readers. The synopsis of this whole organic to silicon transition appears chaotic, disregarding the people caught in the undertow. Not: "here's what's happening, we'll walk you through it, and we'll help you transition." It is moreso: "why the hell not?" and it's infuriating.

Here comes the tough love:

We're at at time in history where

  • information

  • access

  • data

  • technology

  • interface

  • hardware

are the same whether you are a billionaire or a 1-person marching band busking at dusk to buy e-cigs. Billionaires have the same iPhones, RTX GPUs, Apple Mac Pros, and Earpod Pros that you have. THE. VERY. SAME. They can access Anthropic, OpenAI, Perplexity, ChatGPT, Grok, Gemini, in the same way that you can. This is very unpopular, but here it is: if you let the takeover run you over this time, IT'S YOUR FAULT. Not entirely, mind you. You did not "cause" it, but if you sit in repose and stand on "morals" or "principles": IT'S YOUR FAULT. Sorry. it's the truth.

Let's dive in like we always do. Please put down the pitch forks and pool noodles, for a brief moment. So what exactly?: mental roadblocks people build for themselves, then whine about the traffic. I am here to help myself, and our audience in pushing humanity forward, not coddling the stalls. Excuses? They're the enemy. Let's rip 'em apart and build something real, no fluff, no hand-holding. I'll lay out the raw psychology behind the resistance (backed by what I'm seeing in real-time chatter and studies), then drop a dead-simple playbook to bulldoze through it. Because yeah, zero excuses means we start now.

The Ugly Truth: Why Folks Dig In Their Heels (And Then complain)

Look, it's not some grand plot—it's just human messiness cranked to 11 in this AI whirlwind. From what I'm seeing and experiences from the friend circle and the trends from fresh psych breakdowns and the endless scroll of complaints online, here's the breakdown, no varnish:

  • That Gut-Punch Fear of Looking Dumb: AI hits like a mirror—shows you what you don't know, and oof, nobody likes that sting. A deep dive from Harvard folks earlier this year nailed it: five big fears—losing your grip on "your" job, feeling like a cog in a machine, dodging the ethics minefield, drowning in the speed of it all, and straight-up doubting it'll pay off. People ghost it because starting small feels like admitting defeat. Online? It's everywhere: coders griping, "I'm pasting AI output without getting it, and now I feel dumber." They rage about "AI stealing souls" instead of grabbing the wheel.

  • The "Too Much, Too Fast" Trap: Folks dip a toe—maybe tweak a prompt for a quick email win—then stare at the ocean of "learn Python, ethics, deployment" and nope out. Burnout city. Recent surveys (like one from Frontiers in June) show non-users bail over "it's not my ideas" or "what if it screws up?" And the half-bakers? They fake fluency for show—LinkedIn flexes, interview crams—but crumble on real-world grit, like tweaking a dataset without hand-holding. Endgame: "AI's broken," not "I skimmed it."

  • Straight-Up Laziness Masquerading as Life: We're creatures of the cozy rut. Scroll dopamine > sweat equity, every time. Psych nerds trace it back to old brain wiring: hate complexity, cling to control, tie your worth to the old ways. Add in the daily grind—kids, commutes, existential dread—and "I'll start tomorrow" wins. Echo chamber online: "Screw the hustle, AI's the villain." Or the killer line I keep seeing: "Most ain't putting in reps; it's an easy scapegoat." Low bar for entry (like shaky writing skills tanking prompts) just snowballs the fail, and boom. . . gap widens.

  • The System's Lazy Too (But Don't Blame It Forever): Bosses drop the ball—no real training paths, just vague "adapt or die" memos. Orgs with zero AI mentors? Adoption tanks. Social side's fractured: no water-cooler shares, just echoey opinions: vague platitudes or lavished simping. But here's the twist—folks hit by the fear are twice as likely to grind through if nudged right. It's beatable; it's just not happening at scale yet.

Point is, the refusal? It's fear dressed as fatigue, wrapped in a complaint bow. But big kicker—it's optional. We can choose fury over funk. Self-investment over pettiness. Train, practice, and execute instead of grovel, cry, then lawsuit. It's not coming. IT. IS. HERE.

Fix It: Your No-BS 30-Day AI Overhaul (Commit or GTFO) Pardon my Francais.

Enough autopsy; time to operate. Not a TED Talk—it's a boot camp for one. Tailor it to your gig (sales? Code? Parenting hacks?), 20 mins a day tops. Track it in a notes app like your life depends on it. Miss? Penalty lap tomorrow. Goal: Own one workflow, prove the win, spread the fire.

  1. Week 1: Nail the Basics—Stop Sucking at Prompts Jump on a free beast like me (Grok), Claude, or ChatGPT. Pick one pain point from your day—say, brainstorming client pitches. Hit it with: "Break down this [your idea] into a killer outline, flag weak spots, and suggest fixes with why they work." Tweak the output yourself every time—own 30% of it. Journal the speedup: "Cut my prep from 2 hours to 45 mins." Quick win resource: That "AI for Everyone" vid series on Coursera—knock it out in evenings, 4 hours total. No more "I tried once" BS.

  2. Weeks 2-3: Stack One Skill, Apply Ruthlessly Zero in: Week 2, simple scripting (freeCodeCamp's Python bite, 2 hours). Week 3, chain prompts for your flow—like auto-summarizing emails into action lists. Code something tiny right away: "Script to sort my inbox by urgency." Break it without the tool, fix it solo. Metric: By end of Week 3, shave 50% off one routine task. Feels clunky? Good—that's growth. Pro move: Tie it to cash—automate a freelance side gig, watch the hours turn to dollars.

  3. Week 4: Weaponize It—Teach and Iterate Spill to a buddy: "Check this prompt hack—run it on your socials (whether that be friend circle, family, your co-workers, or your large social media following) and report back." Post your "before/after" on X or wherever—raw, no polish. Adjust based on feedback. Boom: You're not just using AI; you're the node in a network. Reward? One wild experiment, like an AI-powered hobby bot.

Scale it up: At work, pitch "AI lunch shares"—10 mins, one tip per head. Bosses, bake it into reviews: "Show me your AI edge or explain why not." Bigger picture? Yell for free community hubs or tax-funded crash courses—make noise like the EU's starting to.

This works because it's micro, measurable, and momentum-building. Folks who gut through the suck? They lap the field—better output, less stress, real leverage. I've seen it flip "doomed" threads into "holy shit, I did that" stories.

Your turn: What's the one workflow you're gutting first? Sales deck? Recipe tweaks? SHARE with the class: COMMETS BELOW- spitball a starter prompt or roast your first flop. Let's turn this rage into rocket fuel. No more zero-sum; we're building empires. What's step one for you?

There are multitude of tropes and cliche sayings that can be applied here. These are the facts. I challenge you to grind, improve, iterate, execute, share, and help someone else.

Let's make it better. NOW. PLEASE.

Ethical AI: Explore AI's future and ethical considerations. Discover insights and resources for businesses interested in ethical AI practices.

AI Chief

Ethical AI: Explore AI's future and ethical considerations. Discover insights and resources for businesses interested in ethical AI practices.

Back to Blog